10 interesting stories served every morning and every evening.




1 690 shares, 43 trendiness

Frontpage of the indieweb

...

Read the original on text.blogosphere.app »

2 654 shares, 34 trendiness

Free AI on Your Mac

The free AI al­ready on your Mac. Every Mac with Apple Silicon has a built-in LLM. Apple locked it be­hind Siri. apfel sets it free - as a CLI tool, an OpenAI-compatible server, and a chat.

The AI is al­ready in­stalled on your Mac. Apple ships it with ma­cOS. apfel just gives you a way to talk to it - from your ter­mi­nal, from your code, from any­where.

No API keys. No sub­scrip­tions. No per-to­ken billing. It’s your hard­ware - use it.

Every to­ken gen­er­ated lo­cally on your Apple Silicon. Nothing leaves your ma­chine. Ever.

Context win­dow for in­put and out­put com­bined. Enough for most sin­gle-turn tasks and short chats.

The model un­der the hood

Apple ML Research

Three ways to use it.

CLI tool, HTTP server, or in­ter­ac­tive chat. Pick the one that fits.

Pipe-friendly and com­pos­able. Works with jq, xargs, and your shell scripts. stdin, std­out, JSON out­put, file at­tach­ments, proper exit codes.

apfel What is the cap­i­tal of Austria?”

The cap­i­tal of Austria is Vienna.

Drop-in re­place­ment at lo­cal­host:11434. Point any OpenAI SDK at it and go. Streaming, tool call­ing, CORS, re­sponse for­mats.

Multi-turn con­ver­sa­tions with au­to­matic con­text man­age­ment. Five trim­ming strate­gies. System prompt sup­port. All on your Mac.

> How do I re­verse a list in Python?

Apple built an LLM into your Mac. apfel gives it a front door.

Starting with ma­cOS 26 (Tahoe), every Apple Silicon Mac in­cludes a lan­guage model as part of Apple Intelligence. Apple ex­poses it through the FoundationModels frame­work - a Swift API that gives apps ac­cess to SystemLanguageModel. All in­fer­ence runs on the Neural Engine and GPU. No net­work calls, no cloud, no API keys. The model is just there.

But Apple only uses it for Siri

Out of the box, the on-de­vice model pow­ers Siri, Writing Tools, and sys­tem fea­tures. There is no ter­mi­nal com­mand, no HTTP end­point, no way to pipe text through it. The FoundationModels frame­work ex­ists, but you need to write a Swift app to use it. That is what apfel does.

apfel is a Swift 6.3 bi­nary that wraps LanguageModelSession and ex­poses it three ways: as a UNIX com­mand-line tool with stdin/​std­out, as an OpenAI-compatible HTTP server (built on Hummingbird), and as an in­ter­ac­tive chat with con­text man­age­ment.

It han­dles the things Apple’s raw API does not: proper exit codes, JSON out­put, file at­tach­ments, five con­text trim­ming strate­gies for the small 4096-token win­dow, real to­ken count­ing via the SDK, and con­ver­sion of OpenAI tool schemas to Apple’s na­tive Transcript. ToolDefinition for­mat.

Shell scripts in the demo/ folder. Install apfel first, then grab the ones you want.

Natural lan­guage to shell com­mand. Say what you want, get the com­mand.

Pipe chains from plain English. awk, sed, sort, uniq - gen­er­ated for you.

Explain any com­mand, er­ror mes­sage, or code snip­pet in plain English.

What’s this di­rec­tory? Instant pro­ject ori­en­ta­tion for any code­base.

Change one URL. Keep your code.

apfel speaks the OpenAI API. Any client li­brary, any frame­work, any tool that talks to OpenAI can talk to your Mac’s AI in­stead. Just change the base URL.

from ope­nai im­port OpenAI

# Just change the base_url. That’s it.

client = OpenAI(

base_url=“http://​lo­cal­host:11434/​v1,

api_key=“un­used” # no auth needed

resp = client.chat.com­ple­tions.cre­ate(

model=“ap­ple-foun­da­tion­model”,

mes­sages=[{

role”: user”,

content”: What is 1+1?”

print(resp.choices[0].mes­sage.con­tent)

...

Read the original on apfel.franzai.com »

3 592 shares, 64 trendiness

Artemis II crew take 'spectacular' image of Earth

Artemis II is now on a loop­ing path that will carry the crew around the far side of the Moon and back again. It is the first time since 1972 that hu­mans have trav­elled out­side of the Earth’s or­bit.

...

Read the original on www.bbc.com »

4 446 shares, 46 trendiness

Oracle Files Thousands of H-1B Visa Petitions Amid Mass Layoffs

Federal data shows the tech gi­ant filed for over 3,000 for­eign worker visas as it cuts thou­sands of American jobs.

Federal data shows the tech gi­ant filed for over 3,000 for­eign worker visas as it cuts thou­sands of American jobs.

Submit your up­dates here. ›

Oracle, the soft­ware com­pany head­quar­tered in Austin, Texas, has filed thou­sands of pe­ti­tions for H-1B visas in the past two fis­cal years, even as it lays off thou­sands of American work­ers as part of a broader or­ga­ni­za­tional shift. Federal data shows Oracle filed for 2,690 H-1B visas in fis­cal year 2025 and 436 so far in fis­cal year 2026, to­tal­ing over 3,100 visa re­quests.

The H-1B visa pro­gram al­lows com­pa­nies to tem­porar­ily em­ploy for­eign work­ers with spe­cial­ized skills, of­ten in the tech in­dus­try. Critics ar­gue the pro­gram is used to re­place American work­ers with cheaper for­eign la­bor, while sup­port­ers say it helps fill cru­cial tal­ent gaps. Oracle’s visa fil­ings amid mass lay­offs raise ques­tions about the com­pa­ny’s mo­ti­va­tions and the broader de­bate over the H-1B pro­gram’s im­pact on the American work­force.

According to U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services data, Oracle America Inc. filed for 2,690 H-1B visas for fis­cal year 2025 and 436 so far for fis­cal year 2026. This comes as Oracle re­port­edly be­gan lay­ing off thou­sands of em­ploy­ees this week, with work­ers re­ceiv­ing let­ters stat­ing today is your last work­ing day.’ The com­pany has not pro­vided pub­lic com­ment on the lay­offs or the H-1B visa fil­ings.

* Oracle filed for 2,690 H-1B visas for fis­cal year 2025, which cov­ers October 1, 2024 to September 30, 2025.

* Oracle filed for 436 H-1B visas so far for fis­cal year 2026, which runs from October 1, 2025 to September 30, 2026.

The full im­pact of Oracle’s lay­offs and H-1B visa fil­ings re­mains to be seen, as the com­pany has not pro­vided de­tailed pub­lic com­ment on its work­force changes and for­eign worker hir­ing plans.

The take­away

Oracle’s ac­tions raise con­cerns about the com­pany po­ten­tially re­plac­ing American work­ers with cheaper for­eign la­bor through the H-1B visa pro­gram, even as it un­der­goes a ma­jor or­ga­ni­za­tional shift. This case high­lights the on­go­ing de­bate over the H-1B pro­gram’s im­pact on the U.S. work­force and the need for greater trans­parency from com­pa­nies uti­liz­ing the pro­gram.

...

Read the original on nationaltoday.com »

5 417 shares, 34 trendiness

One of two US crew members rescued after F-15E jet shot down over Iran

One US ser­vice mem­ber has been res­cued af­ter a US F-15E Strike Eagle fighter was shot down over Iran, prompt­ing a fran­tic ef­fort to lo­cate its two-strong crew, in the first such in­ci­dent since the war be­gan al­most five weeks ago.

US of­fi­cials fa­mil­iar with the sit­u­a­tion said one crew mem­ber was still miss­ing late on Friday, af­ter Iranian state me­dia re­leased im­ages of a tail fin and other de­bris ac­com­pa­nied by an ini­tial claim that an ad­vanced US F-35 had been hit by a new air de­fence sys­tem over cen­tral Iran.

Aviation ex­perts said the wreck­age pic­tured was in fact from a F-15E, from the US air force’s 494th squadron, based at RAF Lakenheath in the UK, though it could not at first be con­firmed when and where the pic­tures were taken. Markings on the wreck­age ap­peared to match those on the tips of the tail fins of Strike Eagles nor­mally based in the UK.

US of­fi­cials later con­firmed off the record that an F-15E had been brought down and the Pentagon was scram­bling to find the crew be­fore the Iranians. There was no of­fi­cial com­ment from the US mil­i­tary about the in­ci­dent.

The down­ing of a US fighter jet comes just days af­ter Donald Trump de­liv­ered a bel­li­cose na­tional ad­dress in which he claimed the US had beaten and com­pletely dec­i­mated Iran” and the con­flict was nearing com­ple­tion”.

We have all the cards. They have none,” the US pres­i­dent de­clared on Wednesday.

The White House press sec­re­tary, Karoline Leavitt, said Trump had been briefed but she did not of­fer any ad­di­tional in­for­ma­tion. In a brief in­ter­view with NBC News, the pres­i­dent de­clined to dis­cuss the search and res­cue mis­sion but said the in­ci­dent would not af­fect ne­go­ti­a­tions with Iran. No, not at all,” he said. No, it’s war. We’re in war.”

Iran’s semi-of­fi­cial Fars news agency said on Friday that Tehran had re­jected a US pro­posal for a 48-hour cease­fire, cit­ing an un­named source.

Details of the res­cue mis­sion were few but it is likely to have been a high-risk op­er­a­tion with res­cue air­craft po­ten­tially ex­posed to fire from the ground. The sta­tus of the sec­ond crew mem­ber was un­clear, with res­cue ef­forts con­tin­u­ing as evening fell in Iran.

Subsequent footage filmed in Iran showed a US C-130 Hercules and a HH-60 Pave Hawk he­li­copter fly­ing low in south-west Iran, and at one point re­fu­elling to­gether dur­ing their res­cue op­er­a­tion.

An Iranian busi­ness­man of­fered to pay a re­ward worth $60,000 (£45,000) to any­one cap­tur­ing the crew mem­bers alive. And a pre­sen­ter on an Iranian TV chan­nel, based in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province, a moun­tain­ous re­gion in the south-west of the coun­try, urged res­i­dents to hand over any enemy pi­lot” to po­lice and promised a re­ward for any­one who did.

That gave a clue to the lo­ca­tion of the in­ci­dent. Geolocated footage of low-fly­ing res­cue air­craft in­di­cated planes fly­ing near Behbahan, in the neigh­bour­ing province of Khuzestan, around 30 miles from the Gulf coast.

The Iranian par­lia­ment speaker, Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf , ridiculed the US, post­ing on so­cial me­dia: After de­feat­ing Iran 37 times in a row, this bril­liant no-strat­egy war they started has now been down­graded from regime change’ to: Hey! Can any­one find our pi­lots? Please?’”

No US troops have so far been taken pris­oner by Iran. Thirteen American ser­vice per­son­nel have been killed and 300 wounded dur­ing a cam­paign in which more than 12,300 tar­gets in Iran have been bombed by the US alone.

A so­cial me­dia ac­count claim­ing to be linked to Iran’s Revolutionary Guards posted a pic­ture of an ejec­tor seat in a desert land­scape, which ap­peared to be con­sis­tent with the ACES II type used in F-15Es. Justin Bronk, an avi­a­tion ex­pert from Rusithe Royal United Services Institute (Rusi), said: If gen­uine, it would sug­gest that at least one of the two air­crew did eject safely.”

Iran’s Tasnim news agency re­ported that the pi­lot of the jet had been taken into cus­tody, con­tra­dict­ing Tehran’s ini­tial claim that the pi­lot had prob­a­bly died in the in­ci­dent. But noth­ing then emerged to ver­ify the re­vised Iranian state­ment.

The New York Times re­ported that a sec­ond US air force com­bat plane crashed in the Persian Gulf re­gion on Friday, but the lone pi­lot was safely res­cued.

The A-10 Warthog at­tack plane went down near the strait of Hormuz at roughly the same time as the air force F-15E was shot down over Iran, ac­cord­ing to two US of­fi­cials. Iranian state me­dia said its air de­fence sys­tem had tar­geted an enemy” A-10 air­craft in south­ern wa­ters near the strait of Hormuz.

Up to now no US fighter jets had been lost over Iran dur­ing the five-week-long con­flict, though three F-15Es were shot down by a Kuwaiti air de­fence sys­tem in a dra­matic friendly fire in­ci­dent on 1 March.

The to­tal cost to the US air force of lost and dam­aged air­craft, which also in­cludes 16 un­crewed Reaper drones, has been es­ti­mated at more than $3bn by the spe­cial­ist news site Airforce Technology. An F-15E cost $31m when de­liv­ered in the late 1990s; newer mod­els cost closer to $100m.

Meanwhile, pow­er­ful blasts rocked north­ern Tehran, as Israel said it had launched a new wave of strikes on the Iranian cap­i­tal and Beirut.

The Associated Press also re­ported, cit­ing an Israeli of­fi­cial, that Israel had sus­pended airstrikes in ar­eas relevant” to the res­cue op­er­a­tion in Iran.

Late on Thursday, the US pres­i­dent re­it­er­ated his threat to bomb Iran’s in­fra­struc­ture, hours af­ter he claimed credit for an at­tack on a newly built 136-metre-high (446ft) sus­pen­sion bridge be­tween Tehran and Karaj that killed eight peo­ple and in­jured 95.

Our Military, the great­est and most pow­er­ful (by far!) any­where in the World, has­n’t even started de­stroy­ing what’s left in Iran. Bridges next, then Electric Power Plants!” he posted on so­cial me­dia, re­peat­ing a threat to de­stroy Iran’s elec­tric­ity net­work.

Fresh footage on Friday showed that the $400m bridge, on a high­way be­tween the Iranian cap­i­tal and a city to the north-west, had been sev­ered in three places by the bomb­ing, in­creas­ing the cost of its even­tual re­pair.

More than 100 in­ter­na­tional law ex­perts signed a joint state­ment on the Just Security web­site warn­ing that state­ments made by Trump and other se­nior US of­fi­cials, and the con­duct of US forces raise se­ri­ous con­cerns about vi­o­la­tions of in­ter­na­tional hu­man rights law and in­ter­na­tional hu­man­i­tar­ian law, in­clud­ing po­ten­tial war crimes”.

A par­tic­u­lar con­cern, they said, was threats made by the US to Iran’s en­ergy in­fra­struc­ture. International law pro­tects from at­tack ob­jects in­dis­pens­able to the sur­vival of civil­ians, and the at­tacks threat­ened by Trump, if im­ple­mented, could en­tail war crimes.”

A power and de­sali­na­tion plant in Kuwait was dam­aged in an at­tack on Friday, though Iran blamed Israel for the at­tack. The Mina al-Ah­madi re­fin­ery in the Gulf coun­try was also closed af­ter a drone strike from Iran, while the UK an­nounced it had agreed to send a counter drone team to help the coun­try in its de­fence.

Israeli me­dia re­ported that the US had told Israel it did not want Iran’s new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, to be killed be­cause Americans wanted to have at least one se­nior po­lit­i­cal fig­ure avail­able who could ne­go­ti­ate a peace agree­ment.

Iran’s regime, how­ever, has so far shown lit­tle de­sire to stop fight­ing. Sirens sounded re­peat­edly in Israel, as mis­sile at­tacks from Iran and Lebanon con­tin­ued but ca­su­alty num­bers were small, with 12 peo­ple treated for phys­i­cal in­juries by the coun­try’s emer­gency med­ical ser­vice in the past 24 hours.

Israel also car­ried out fresh strikes on south Beirut af­ter is­su­ing an evac­u­a­tion or­der for the area, which has largely been emp­tied of res­i­dents amid re­peated raids.

...

Read the original on www.theguardian.com »

6 392 shares, 23 trendiness

Samsung Magician disk utility takes 18 steps and two Recovery Mode reboots to uninstall

Every time I ut­ter the phrase Samsung Magician,” a fully formed plan for re­in­stat­ing the Inquisition is pre­sented to me, whose sole goal is to burn this Magician at the stake.

What kind of fuck­ing name is that any­way? Samsung Magician” - for a disk util­ity? Who green­lit this? Who sat in a meet­ing and said yeah, Magician, like it does magic” ?

The ac­tual steps are at the end, now sit back and let me take you on a won­der­ful jour­ney full of won­der way down into the Samsung shit­ter. We will find ex­actly what we ex­pected, but more of it.

I needed to set an en­cryp­tion pass­word on my T7 Shield SSD portable drive. To take ad­van­tage of the dri­ve’s hard­ware en­cryp­tion en­gine, I needed to use Samsung’s Magician soft­ware. I in­stalled it. It did­n’t work. I wanted it gone. So I started to look at how to re­move this soft­ware.

First, there’s no unin­staller. Samsung - a tril­lion-dol­lar com­pany - ships Mac soft­ware with no unin­stall but­ton. No drag-to-trash. Nothing.

So I’ve dug around and found a cleanup script buried six fold­ers deep in­side the app bun­dle. Let’s try to run it:

It ran. And my kitty ex­ploded. Sweet kitty over­flowed. Hundreds - lit­er­ally hun­dreds - of lines of chown: Operation not per­mit­ted. The scrip­t’s grand strat­egy for unin­stalling it­self is to change the own­er­ship of every sin­gle file, one by one, so it can then delete them. Except ma­cOS blocks every sin­gle at­tempt. Five hun­dred chown er­rors. The script does­n’t stop, does­n’t catch the er­rors, does­n’t try plan B. It just keeps slam­ming its head into the wall for every file and then fin­ishes like yep, all done boss.” So, at this stage the files are all still there.

I rm -rf every Samsung folder I could find. The Preferences. The Caches. The LaunchAgents. The LaunchDaemons. The ker­nel ex­ten­sions. The crash re­ports. I run eight, nine, ten sep­a­rate rm -rf com­mands tar­get­ing dif­fer­ent cor­ners of the filesys­tem where nor­mal ap­pli­ca­tions would usu­ally be:

Then I run find / -iname *samsung*magician*” to check. 27 files STILL THERE!!! After the cleanup script. After nine man­ual delete com­mands, 27 files are still on my ma­chine, scat­tered across lo­ca­tions like:

* Kernel ex­ten­sions in /Library/StagedExtensions/ (dead dri­vers that ma­cOS won’t let you touch)

* The same ker­nel ex­ten­sions AGAIN in /System/Volumes/Data/Library/StagedExtensions/ (because ma­cOS mir­rors them,

so you get to see them twice)

* Package re­ceipts in /private/var/db/receipts/ (Samsung left its re­ceipts be­hind like a bur­glar leav­ing a bunch

of turds in the liv­ing room)

* Cached processes in /private/var/folders/7v/ (yes, Samsung is in there too)

* A crash re­porter list (because of course it crashed at some point)

* And a Samsung Magician folder in Application Support that some­how sur­vived every­thing

I ran find one fi­nal time and eight files re­mained.

And so at last, Samsung Magician per­forms its fi­nal and great­est trick. Behold, ladies and gen­tle­men! Step right up! Watch in awe as four dead files defy dele­tion, sur­vive every com­mand thrown at them, and take up per­ma­nent res­i­dence in the deep­est, most pro­tected vault your op­er­at­ing sys­tem has. sudo rm -rf? Pathetic. These files aren’t go­ing any­where.

Now, I can’t stand any trace of it, you see. I want it gone.

I shut down my Mac. Held the power but­ton. Booted into Recovery Mode. Opened Terminal. Ran csru­til dis­able. Rebooted. Opened Terminal. Deleted the ker­nel ex­ten­sions. Ran find to con­firm they’re gone. Shut down AGAIN. Booted into Recovery Mode AGAIN. Ran csru­til en­able. Rebooted AGAIN. All this just to delete four dead files and their mir­rors from a disk util­ity.

In other words, two re­boots into Recovery Mode to re­move four dead files from a disk util­ity that did­n’t even fuck­ing work in the first moth­er­fuck­ing place.

The most in­sane thing was­n’t the ab­surd dif­fi­culty of re­mov­ing it. It was the Magician’s in­sides.

Samsung Magician comes with frame-by-frame PNG an­i­ma­tion se­quences. For a spin­ning cir­cle. There are over 150 in­di­vid­u­ally num­bered PNG files called things like Circle mo­tion_00001.png through Circle mo­tion_00149.png just to show you a lit­tle an­i­ma­tion that says Health: Good.” That’s not a joke. A team of Samsung en­gi­neers built this, a pro­ject man­ager ap­proved it, QA tested it (allegedly), and at no point in that en­tire chain did a sin­gle hu­man be­ing raise their hand and say: hey, should a disk util­ity re­ally ship with 150 hand-num­bered PNGs of a spin­ning cir­cle?”

And it gets bet­ter. There’s a sep­a­rate set of 150 PNGs for Health: Critical.” And an­other set for a gamer” theme. And an­other set for fin­ger­print progress an­i­ma­tions. And fin­ger­print suc­cess an­i­ma­tions. We’re talk­ing about hun­dreds upon hun­dreds of in­di­vid­ual PNG files for dec­o­ra­tive an­i­ma­tions in a DISK UTILITY.

* An en­tire Electron frame­work - yes, they em­bed­ded a full Chromium browser en­gine to show you a pie chart of your disk space

* Squirrel frame­work - an auto-up­date frame­work, be­cause what if this night­mare were to end too early?

* Custom Samsung fonts in mul­ti­ple weights (200, 300, 400, 450, 500, 600, 700, 800) be­cause ap­par­ently sys­tem fonts

aren’t good enough for dis­play­ing 128GB free”

* Localization files for every lan­guage on Earth - Korean, Japanese, Chinese, German, French, Italian, Russian,

Portuguese, Spanish, Arabic, Hindi, Bengali, Tamil, Telugu, Gujarati, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Urdu, Swahili, Filipino,

Afrikaans - Samsung re­ally wanted to make sure every­one on the planet could ex­pe­ri­ence this suf­fer­ing equally

* Banner ad­ver­tise­ment JPGs (banner_1.jpg through ban­ner_5.jpg) - that’s right, the app that you in­stalled to man­age

your hard­ware shows you ads

* Help doc­u­men­ta­tion with 40+ screen­shots in 10 lan­guages

Samsung Magician is an in­fes­ta­tion. It’s a mon­u­ment to bloat, a love let­ter to un­nec­es­sary soft­ware and cor­po­rate bull­shit, and a huge meaty mid­dle fin­ger to every user who just wanted to set a pass­word on their portable drive.

Look for an unin­stall but­ton in the app. There is­n’t one.

Run it. Watch 500 chown: Operation not per­mit­ted er­rors wa­ter­fall down your ter­mi­nal. Nothing is re­moved.

Run find. Discover 27 files still re­main­ing across six dif­fer­ent sys­tem di­rec­to­ries.

Manually delete the SECOND Samsung Magician folder in Application Support (yes, there were two).

Run find again. Eight ker­nel ex­ten­sion files re­main, pro­tected by SIP.

Shut down Mac. Boot into Recovery Mode AGAIN. Re-enable SIP. Reboot AGAIN.

...

Read the original on chalmovsky.com »

7 373 shares, 14 trendiness

Marc Andreessen is wrong about introspection

Appearing on the Founders pod­cast this week, ven­ture cap­i­tal­ist Marc Andreessen made the rather ex­tra­or­di­nary claim that - go­ing back four hun­dred years - it would never have oc­curred to any­one to be introspective.”

Andreessen ap­par­ently blames Sigmund Freud and the Vienna Circle with hav­ing some­how manufactured” the whole prac­tice of in­tro­spec­tion some­where be­tween 1910-1920. He sum­marised his own ap­proach to life thus: Move for­ward. Go.”

Host David Senra, ap­par­ently de­lighted, con­grat­u­lated Andreessen on de­vel­op­ing what he called a zero-introspection mind­set.”

Marc Andreessen was right about web browsers.

But he has since been wrong about a great many things.

And he is en­tirely wrong about in­tro­spec­tion.

If we ac­cept that in­tro­spec­tion is a Viennese in­ven­tion of the early twen­ti­eth cen­tury, we have to ex­plain away…well, rather a lot.

Socrates made the ex­am­ined life a con­di­tion of the life worth liv­ing, and he ar­guably died for it. The Stoics built an en­tire philo­soph­i­cal prac­tice around self-ex­am­i­na­tion: Marcus Aurelius wrote the Meditations as a pri­vate ex­er­cise in catch­ing him­self fail­ing to live by his own prin­ci­ples, and he did this while run­ning the Roman Empire, which sug­gests he did­n’t find the two ac­tiv­i­ties in­com­pat­i­ble. Augustine’s Confessions, writ­ten around 400 AD, of­fer a sus­tained and search­ing ac­count of his own in­te­rior life that pre­dates Freud by about fif­teen cen­turies, give or take.

In Chinese phi­los­o­phy, Mencius de­scribes the con­cept of in­tro­spec­tion as seeking the lost heart,” the re­cov­ery of some­thing in­nate that gets buried un­der the noise of or­di­nary life. Shakespeare’s Hamlet is a play about what hap­pens when you’re con­sti­tu­tion­ally un­able to stop ex­am­in­ing your­self and start act­ing, and the fact that Elizabethan au­di­ences im­me­di­ately rec­og­nized this as a prob­lem im­plies they were al­ready some­what fa­mil­iar with the prac­tice be­ing sat­i­rized; you can’t par­ody a con­cept your au­di­ence has never en­coun­tered.

Andreessen’s novel idea that Freud in­vented in­tro­spec­tion is an in­ver­sion of the record. What Freud ac­tu­ally did was sys­tem­atize cer­tain ideas about the un­con­scious that were al­ready cir­cu­lat­ing in European in­tel­lec­tual cul­ture and put them into a clin­i­cal frame­work. Half of those ideas were them­selves wrong; but Freud was of­ten wrong” is a very dif­fer­ent ar­gu­ment from people had no in­ner lives worth ex­am­in­ing be­fore 1910.”

Andreessen is no stranger to the writ­ten word. His Techno-Optimist Manifesto quotes Nietzsche, he ref­er­ences the Italian Futurists with ad­mi­ra­tion and he’s not un­fa­mil­iar with the Western philo­soph­i­cal tra­di­tion. So the his­tor­i­cal re­vi­sion­ism can’t be called ig­no­rance; this is, on some level, a cal­cu­lated move. The claim that in­tro­spec­tion is a mod­ern pathol­ogy serves a spe­cific rhetor­i­cal func­tion by dele­git­imiz­ing an en­tire mode of en­gage­ment with hu­man ex­pe­ri­ence, clear­ing it off the table, and leav­ing only ex­ter­nal ac­tion as the proper re­sponse to ~being alive.

Andreessen and his cronies are mak­ing large claims about what hu­man be­ings want and need. His stated per­sonal phi­los­o­phy is ex­plic­itly a vi­sion of hu­man flour­ish­ing: abun­dance, growth, the elim­i­na­tion of ma­te­r­ial con­straints etc. These are claims about what will make peo­ple’s lives go well. But you can’t eval­u­ate those claims with­out some ac­count of hu­man in­ner life, be­cause hu­man in­ner life is where the ques­tion of whether a life is go­ing well ac­tu­ally gets an­swered. You can mea­sure GDP. You can mea­sure life ex­pectancy. You can mea­sure the num­ber of trans­ac­tions per sec­ond your pay­ment proces­sor han­dles. But none, not one sin­gle of these mea­sure­ments will tell you whether the peo­ple whose lives they de­scribe feel that their lives are worth liv­ing, whether they find their work mean­ing­ful, whether they wake up with some­thing that re­sem­bles pur­pose.

The only ac­cess any­one has to those ques­tions is through some­thing like in­tro­spec­tion: ei­ther their own, or some­one else’s hon­est re­ports of their ex­pe­ri­ence, or the ac­cu­mu­lated tes­ti­mony of lit­er­a­ture and phi­los­o­phy about what it’s like to be a liv­ing, breath­ing, doubt­ing, hurt­ing, in­ter­nally-scream­ing hu­man be­ing float­ing on a God-forsaken rock in a God-forsaken void. Strip that out and you’re left with a very thin the­ory of hu­man flour­ish­ing. It ba­si­cally runs to more is bet­ter, faster is bet­ter, big­ger is bet­ter with noth­ing else added or sub­tracted or at­tempted.

Perhaps, you find this to be a de­fen­si­ble po­si­tion; but you still have to ac­tu­ally ar­gue for it. You can’t just claim that the ques­tion of what peo­ple find mean­ing­ful is a Viennese in­ven­tion and move on.

The re­sponse to Andreessen’s in­ter­view that keeps cir­cu­lat­ing is that he hath no soul.”

This is, of course, wrong.

Andreessen al­most cer­tainly has a rich in­ner life. He has en­thu­si­asms and anx­i­eties and aes­thetic pref­er­ences and tribal loy­al­ties and all the rest of it. The prob­lem is­n’t that there’s noth­ing in­side; the prob­lem is that he’s cho­sen not to ex­am­ine what’s there, and has de­vel­oped an elab­o­rate post-hoc jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for that choice by claim­ing that ex­am­i­na­tion is it­self the pathol­ogy.

This is a rec­og­niz­able pat­tern. The Victorian vi­tal­ists who viewed mas­tur­ba­tion as phys­i­cally de­bil­i­tat­ing were wrong about the phys­i­ol­ogy, but they were also en­gaged in mo­ti­vated rea­son­ing: they al­ready knew they wanted to pro­hibit some­thing, and the sci­en­tific-sound­ing jus­ti­fi­ca­tion came later. Andreessen al­ready knows he wants to move fast with­out ex­am­in­ing him­self, and the his­tor­i­cal ar­gu­ment that in­tro­spec­tion is a Freudian man­u­fac­ture serves ex­actly that same func­tion.

The prac­ti­cal con­se­quences of an un­ex­am­ined in­ner life at scale are not the­o­ret­i­cal. The so­cial me­dia plat­forms built by peo­ple who be­lieved be­hav­ioral data was a re­li­able sub­sti­tute for un­der­stand­ing hu­man psy­chol­ogy pro­duced a decade of en­gage­ment met­rics while user well­be­ing de­clined and our en­tire so­cial or­der de­cayed. The en­gi­neers who built these sys­tems weren’t ma­li­cious; they were op­ti­miz­ing for things they could mea­sure, be­cause they’d im­plic­itly ac­cepted the view that mea­sur­able out­puts were a suf­fi­cient model of hu­man flour­ish­ing. Goodhart’s Law ex­acted its toll: the mea­sure be­came the tar­get, and the tar­get was not what any­one would have cho­sen if they’d been forced to ac­tu­ally spec­ify what they were aim­ing for.

Andreessen’s ad­vice to him­self, and ap­par­ently to oth­ers, is di­rec­tional with­out be­ing spe­cific. Forward, he says. Forward to­ward what? His man­i­festo ob­sesses over abun­dance, over the elim­i­na­tion of ma­te­r­ial suf­fer­ing, and a fu­ture in which tech­nol­ogy has lifted con­straints that cur­rently limit hu­man pos­si­bil­ity. These are goals I can get be­hind. But forward” pre­sup­poses that you know where you’re go­ing, and know­ing where you’re go­ing pre­sup­poses that you know what you want, and know­ing what you want does­n’t hap­pen with­out ex­actly the ex­am­i­na­tion the man has ruled out.

Andreessen’s model of hu­man be­ings is thin. He can ob­serve be­hav­ior. He can track pref­er­ences as ex­pressed through mar­ket choices. He can mea­sure what peo­ple click on and buy and use. What he can’t do, with­out some­thing like in­tro­spec­tion, is un­der­stand why, and the why is where most of the im­por­tant in­for­ma­tion lives.

Four hun­dred years ago, the peo­ple Andreessen imag­ines were bliss­fully un­self­con­scious were read­ing Augustine and Montaigne and ar­gu­ing about Stoic phi­los­o­phy. They were writ­ing di­aries and let­ters that ex­am­ined their own mo­tives with con­sid­er­able care. They were not, in fact, just mov­ing for­ward with­out ask­ing where they were go­ing. That habit is not a pathol­ogy Freud in­tro­duced into an oth­er­wise healthy civ­i­liza­tion. It’s one of the things that makes civ­i­liza­tion pos­si­ble, and pre­tend­ing oth­er­wise does­n’t make you a builder. It just makes you some­one who’s never looked at the blue­prints.

...

Read the original on www.joanwestenberg.com »

8 366 shares, 29 trendiness

iNaturalist

Explore and share your ob­ser­va­tions from the nat­ural world.

Every ob­ser­va­tion can con­tribute to bio­di­ver­sity sci­ence, from the rarest but­ter­fly to the most com­mon back­yard weed. We share your find­ings with sci­en­tific data repos­i­to­ries like the

Global Biodiversity Information Facility

to help sci­en­tists find and use your data. All you have to do is ob­serve.

Record your en­coun­ters with other or­gan­isms and main­tain life lists, all in the cloud.

Help sci­en­tists and re­source man­agers un­der­stand when and where or­gan­isms oc­cur.

Connect with ex­perts who can iden­tify the or­gan­isms you ob­serve.

Find a pro­ject with a mis­sion that in­ter­ests you, or start your own.

Build your knowl­edge by talk­ing with other nat­u­ral­ists and help­ing oth­ers.

Hold an event where peo­ple try to find as many species as pos­si­ble.

Works On All Your Devices

Install our mo­bile apps so you can al­ways ob­serve, even with­out cell re­cep­tion or wifi.

...

Read the original on www.inaturalist.org »

9 356 shares, 12 trendiness

European Alternatives to US Products & Software

Your di­rec­tory for European soft­ware, prod­ucts and ser­vices. For en­hanced pri­vacy, qual­ity, and a strong Europe.

Select your cur­rently used ser­vices and in­stantly re­ceive tai­lored European so­lu­tions — se­cure, pri­vacy-com­pli­ant, and pow­er­ful.

Your di­rec­tory for European soft­ware, prod­ucts and ser­vices. For en­hanced pri­vacy, qual­ity, and a strong Europe.

Select your cur­rently used ser­vices and in­stantly re­ceive tai­lored European so­lu­tions — se­cure, pri­vacy-com­pli­ant, and pow­er­ful.

What Europe does bet­ter

EU com­pa­nies are sub­ject to the world’s strictest en­vi­ron­men­tal reg­u­la­tions. European prod­ucts are de­signed for longevity — less throw­away cul­ture, more re­spon­si­bil­ity.

Made in Europe has stood for top qual­ity and dura­bil­ity for decades. Strict stan­dards guar­an­tee fair work­ing con­di­tions, while shorter sup­ply chains mea­sur­ably re­duce CO₂.

EU providers are sub­ject to the GDPR — the strictest data pro­tec­tion law world­wide. Your data be­longs to you, not ad­ver­tis­ing net­works. Note: US soft­ware can be com­pelled by the CLOUD Act to sur­ren­der data to US au­thor­i­ties — even if servers are lo­cated in Europe.

...

Read the original on only-eu.eu »

10 321 shares, 15 trendiness

NHS staff refusing to use FDP over Palantir ethical concerns

A grow­ing num­ber of NHS staff are re­port­edly re­fus­ing to work on the Fed­er­ated Data Platform (FDP) due to eth­i­cal con­cerns with its US-based provider, Palantir. The US tech­nol­ogy com­pany was awarded a £330 mil­lion con­tract in 2023 to col­late op­er­a­tional data, in­clud­ing pa­tient in­for­ma­tion and wait­ing lists. However, Palantir’s in­volve­ment in the US de­fence sec­tor and its lead­er­ship’s po­lit­i­cal af­fil­i­a­tions have made the part­ner­ship con­tentious.

Senior health of­fi­cials and data an­a­lysts have de­scribed a workplace ad­just­ment” where em­ploy­ees of­fi­cially refuse to en­gage with the soft­ware. Some staff mem­bers re­port­edly work as slowly as pos­si­ble when pres­sured to use the plat­form, while oth­ers avoid it en­tirely, cit­ing bet­ter al­ter­na­tives. Despite this re­sis­tance, 123 of 205 hos­pi­tal trusts in England are cur­rently us­ing the FDP, and the pro­ject has re­ceived a high rat­ing for on-time and on-bud­get de­liv­ery.

The gov­ern­ment is cur­rently un­der pres­sure from MPs and med­ical unions to eject the com­pany from NHS sys­tems. Reports sug­gest that min­is­ters have sought ad­vice on trig­ger­ing a con­tract break clause. While Louis Mosley, the ex­ec­u­tive vice-chair of Palantir in the UK, main­tains that such cam­paigns are ide­o­log­i­cally mo­ti­vated and could harm pa­tient care, the level of dis­sent un­der­scores a sig­nif­i­cant di­vide over the com­pa­ny’s suit­abil­ity to man­age na­tional health data.

Training Announcement: The IAPP Certified Information Privacy Technologist (CIPT) is a pri­vacy-fo­cused pro­fes­sional IT cer­tifi­cate from the IAPP that ad­dresses data pro­tec­tion re­quire­ments and con­trols within com­plex tech­no­log­i­cal en­vi­ron­ments. It ex­plores the data life­cy­cle, pri­vacy risk mod­els and frame­works, the prin­ci­ples of Privacy by Design, and the role of pri­vacy-en­hanc­ing tech­nolo­gies within the or­gan­i­sa­tion. Find out more.

...

Read the original on www.freevacy.com »

To add this web app to your iOS home screen tap the share button and select "Add to the Home Screen".

10HN is also available as an iOS App

If you visit 10HN only rarely, check out the the best articles from the past week.

If you like 10HN please leave feedback and share

Visit pancik.com for more.